Brexit Britain has escaped 94,000 new EU laws and rules since leaving the EU
Facts4EU reveals the magnitude of the EU’s legal machine controlling people’s lives
Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2024
In the four years since we left, the EU’s legal factory has been in overdrive
For Rejoiners who ask “What has Brexit ever done for you?” we provide yet another example of a major benefit of the United Kingdom’s exit from the European Union.
Scarcely any aspect of people’s and businesses’ lives has been untouched by the EU’s obsession with determining what they can or cannot do. Now at least Great Britain (excluding Northern Ireland) no longer has to kowtow to all the autocrats in Brussels, Strasbourg and Luxembourg.
The exception is the European Court of Human Rights, to which the UK as a whole remains subservient. (See ‘Observations’ below.)
Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary
Since leaving the EU on 31 Jan 2020, here is what Great Britain has escaped
In the last four years the EU’s legal machine has produced the following :-
- EU law and case-law (69,294)
- Legal acts (14,346)
- Treaties (2)
- International agreements (1,997)
- Preparatory documents (32,505)
- Case-law (20,030)
- EFTA documents (414)
- National law and case-law (22,066)
- National transposition (21,260)
- National case-law (806)
- JURE case-law (863)
- Grand total : 93,997
(This is the number of documents in the database encompassing all of the above.)
[Source : The EU’s legal database, accessed 04 Feb 2024.]
© Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2024 - click to enlarge
Former Brexit Minister The Rt Hon David Jones MP
"The European Union is a giant regulatory factory, as this excellent report graphically illustrates.
"Our British Common Law tradition is very different from the EU's. Put simply, our legal system allows us to do anything that is not expressly forbidden; the EU, by contrast, seeks to micromanage every facet of personal and commercial life.
"We must, however, do much more to advance the Brexit revolution. We have assimilated thousands of pre-departure European Union laws through the Retained EU Law Act. The Government must rapidly review the utility of those laws and, where they are not of positive benefit, they should be swept away.
"Brexit should be a continuous, liberating process, and the Government must do much more to advance it."
- David Jones MP, commenting to Facts4EU.Org and CIBUK.Org, 05 Feb 2024
Here is just one example
In order to give readers some idea of what Great Britain has dodged, we present an example chosen at random.
Just one random example
Title : “Regulation (EU) 2023/2411 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 October 2023 on the protection of geographical indications for craft and industrial products and amending Regulations (EU) 2017/1001 and (EU) 2019/1753”
Summary : “This Regulation lays down rules on:
(a) registration and protection of, and controls in relation to, geographical indications designating craft and industrial products with a given quality, reputation or other characteristic linked to their geographical origin; and
(b) geographical indications entered in the international register established under the Geneva Act of the Lisbon Agreement on Appellations of Origin and Geographical Indications (‘the Geneva Act’) administered by the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO).”
No. of pages : 56
This is only one new Regulation out of thousands avoided by Great Britain since our exit from the European Union four years ago.
A layman’s guide to why the EU does this on an industrial scale
Facts4EU’s lawyer friends should probably look away now, but in layman’s terms the EU operates under the Napoleonic Code, rather than the Common Law system which is used by so many countries around the world.
In very, very broad terms English law means you can do something unless it is prohibited by statute. The continental approach is different. They prefer to dictate what you can do. If it isn’t prohibited under law it does not mean you won’t be prosecuted for doing something, merely that they have not yet passed a law permitting or denying it.
The end result is a plethora of legal instruments which are churned out on an industrial scale.
The constitution of the United Kingdom
The decision last week by Sir Jeffrey Donaldson’s DUP to re-enter the Stormont Assembly in Belfast is something we fail to understand.
Northern Ireland remains under thousands of EU laws and other legal instruments. Neither its elected representatives nor its people have any say over these, nor does the Assembly have a vote over the many thousands of new laws which are produced by the EU each year.
The Province remains subject to a foreign power and its courts. And the residents of Northern Ireland – who are United Kingdom citizens – can do nothing about this.
If we receive more funding we intend to bring readers an important report, updating our previous reports on the topic.
Mr Sunak, the ECHR, and his electoral chances
The UK might not have to transpose EU laws into UK law any longer (except in Northern Ireland), but it remains under the sovereignty of the European Court of Human Rights.
Based on our mailbag, amongst many other things we recommend that the Prime Minister immediately withdraws the United Kingdom from the jurisdiction of the ECHR. If he were to man-up and do this, his electoral fortunes – and those of hundreds of his MPs – would certainly improve.
Another Brexit benefit
Despite the caveats above, our report today demonstrates why the UK was right to leave the EU. Since 01 February 2020 Great Britain has no longer needed to translate thousands of new EU laws, regulations, directives and rules into UK law.
Rejoiners can deflect onto any subjects they wish to, but they cannot deny that the right of the British people to live in a country where a foreign power does not dictate what they can and cannot do is of paramount importance. It’s called ‘Sovereignty’.
We must get reports like this out there
Reports like the one above take far longer to research, write and produce than many people realise. If they were easy, readers would see other organisations also producing these daily. However, there’s little point in the Facts4EU.Org team working long hours, seven days-a-week, if we lack the resources to promote them effectively – to the public, to MPs, and to the media. This is where you come in, dear reader.
Facts4EU.Org needs you today
We are a 'not for profit' team (we make a loss) and any payment goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.
We badly need more of our thousands of readers to become members, to support this work. Could this be you, today? It's quick and easy, we give you a choice of two highly secure payment providers, and we do NOT ask you for further support if you pay once. We just hope you keep supporting us. Your membership stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.
Please don't assume that other people will keep us going - we don't receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us? We rely 100% on public contributions from readers like you.
If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please join now by clicking on one of the links below or you can use our Support page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 48 hours. Thank you.
[ Sources: EU legal services | DUP ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.
Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Mon 05 Feb 2024
Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don't forget actually to post your message after you have previewed it!
Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.
Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.
We think facts matter. Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.
Paypal Users Only - Choose amount first