EXCLUSIVE: Sir Keir to give EU control of UK electricity - “All pay, no say”
Electric shock - Huge new costs have been discussed with the EU, on top of bills for the supply
Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2026
With EU bills this high for us all, will any of Sir Keir’s ‘EU Re-Set’ be worth the candle?
Facts4EU asks:
“Did the EU see our ‘Giving it all away’ Prime Minister coming?”
The startlingly high level of annual costs the EU will be demanding from the British taxpayer to join its grid is likely to be so bad we would describe it as “All pay and no say”. Additionally, the UK is required to give up any control of the amount of electricity coming from the grid, with stringent conditions attached.
In response to questioning by GB News, to whom we gave an advance copy of this report, we told them:“Of all the elements of the Government’s EU Re-Set, they don’t come more important than the security of supply of the UK’s electricity – and its costs.” As with many major reports such as this, we acknowledge the assistance of ‘Stand for Our Sovereignty’ and the Campaign for an Independent Britain (CIBUK.org).
So far, the Government has said very little about this, so we looked at the EU’s output which is far more extensive. This report is built on references to the extra costs which are involved in EU internal documents taken from the EU’s new ‘transparency’ system.
The truly shocking part of the costs which are in the EU documents relate to a vast area of the EU’s budget which has nothing to do with electricity. It is potentially so expensive, and so unconnected with the grid, that the Government’s failure to inform the public can only be described as “lying about the Re-Set by omission”.
Lord Redwood commented exclusively to Facts4EU and GB News

“He wants to pay the EU for inflicting this damage on us.
“Then he wants on top to free gift them a large unspecified sum to help them tackle their economic and policy failures in countries of their Union.
“This is the man who wants to give away the valuable base of Diego Garcia to Mauritius and fell for the need to pay them a huge sum to take the gift!”
- The Rt Hon Lord Redwood, 08 Apr 2026
What will we be paying for, if this goes ahead – and why?
The bizarre element to this story is that the EU are demanding the UK share in the astronomical cost of its ‘Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion funding’ – something it had to do as a Member.
One part of this funding is actually called “the Cohesion Fund”. For years, the UK contributed to this Fund. Asd we reported over the years, the sums were enormous, yet the UK never received a single Euro from it. The UK paid in billions but the EU never paid out.
How much could be demanded by the EU this time?
The EU’s paperwork does not contain actual numbers but with the overall sums involved it seems the total demanded from the UK will be high.
As a member, the UK contributed around 13.5% of the total budget for these funds. Even if the EU sets the UK’s percentage to be one-quarter of its previous level, it would still involve payments in the order of billions.
The EU’s ‘Economic, Social and Territorial Cohesion funding’
Example if UK were to be charged only ¼ of its former percentage
- Total EU budget allocated, 2021-2027: €367.3bn
- UK’s contribution: £12.4bn
[Source: EU Commission, accessed Easter Monday 2026.]
What this money pays for: “Reducing economic and social disparities” in the EU (but not in the UK)
To bring this home to readers, we are showing examples of what this money was spent on when the UK was a Member of the EU.
While British people were despairing of ever having decent roads and reliable train services, Poland and other countries were having the 'Rolls Royce' of infrastructure projects built. And this all happened partly at the expense of the UK taxpayer.
Below is an example from a report we published in 2018.
© Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2026 - click to enlarge
[Source(s) : EU Commission / Wikipedia Commons Licence]
The Government’s “news blackout” over this information
Crucially, the EU’s demand for the UK to pay into this fund is not even mentioned in the Government’s pre-Christmas statement. It is only via painstaking research that we are able to bring this information to readers' attention.
Unsurprisingly, we and our colleagues at Stand for our Sovereignty and CIBUK are accusing the Government of operating “a news blackout” about this extra layer of cost for the UK economy. These potentially massive costs will be levied over and above the cost of the electricity and on top of paying the EU for a significant administration fee.
Lord Redwood comments again
“The PM is the world's worst negotiator. He wants to sign us up to even dearer energy and higher energy taxes than we already have. He wants to throw away any UK right to amend or improve the system. This sentences us to perpetually dearer energy which will complete the disastrous de-industrialisation of the UK which his home policies have furthered.”
Lord Redwood, 08 Apr 2026
Reaching the widest possible audience - with GB News!
This is one of many 'EU Re-Set Specials' we will be producing in association with GB News.
Whilst we can reach tens of thousands – and for some reports over half-a-million – we are sure readers will agree that collaborating with ‘Britain’s News Channel’ helps our well-researched work reach a large number of people who would otherwise not see it.
As we write, their coverage of this report is the No.1 item on the main UK Politics page.
Please do your bit by clicking on the GBN image to increase page views and keep us flying high! If you are not already a Member, it's well worth it.
And please find it in yourself to become a Facts4EU Member now.
We need your support, just as the People's Channel does!
The EU itself provides the proof
According to the EU, since Sir Keir Starmer’s UK-EU Re-Set Summit on 19 May 2025, the Commission and the UK Government have explored in detail “the necessary conditions” for the UK's possible participation in the Union's internal electricity market.
The official paperwork has been approved by the EU Parliament’s ‘COREPER’ and has been sent to the Council of the 27 EU countries to sign. It includes the following.
From the EU's own official documents
“The EU aims to establish a permanent, legally binding mechanism for the financial contribution of the United Kingdom towards reducing economic and social disparities between the regions of the Union, at an appropriate level.
“The financial contribution of the United Kingdom should be calculated based on the Union financial contribution towards reducing the disparities between the regions of the Union, adjusted to reflect the relative size of the UK economy and the proportion of the internal market to which the United Kingdom participates.”
- Paper to the EU Council to approve the EU’s position, 22 Dec 2025
The questions must surely be:
- What do economic conditions between EU countries have to do with the UK, and
- What relevance does this have to Sir Keir’s desire to sign the UK up to the EU’s electricity market?
It’s all pay and no say
Throughout the EU Commission’s paper, over and again it is reiterated that EU rules will apply, that the UK should immediately align with any changes, and that the UK will have no say. Here are just a few examples:-
From the EU's own official documents
“The agreement should not give the United Kingdom the right to participate in the Union's decision-making.”
“The agreement should provide for an obligation for the United Kingdom to dynamically align to the relevant Union legislation. The mechanism of dynamic alignment should ensure that identical rules within the scope of the agreement are simultaneously applied.”
“The agreement should ensure uniform interpretation and application of Union law on the basis of the case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union; in particular, the interpretation given to the applicable rules within the Union should also apply in the context of the relations between the Parties.”
- Paper to the EU Council to approve the EU’s position, 22 Dec 2025
Brexit Facts4EU.Org Summary
Below is another example from a Facts4EU.Org Report of 2018, showing how the UK's money was used on 'cohesion'
Łódź has a population of just 685,000, making it smaller than Nottingham. The EU spent UK money building an underground system there.
Łódź Fabryczna station - Wikipedia Commons Licence - click to enlarge
In August 2018 the EU Commission approved additional expenditure on top of what it had already sanctioned, for some railway improvements in the city of Łódź, Poland. The last time we checked, the total was nearly £0.6 billion pounds.
In summary, 'the EU' financed a new underground system for Poland’s third city, Łódź, to make life easier for Polish commuters. In reality this sort of funding would not have been possible without the UK taxpayer.
The big question: What do these expensive EU 'cohesion' projects have to do with a deal on electricity between the UK and the EU?
It isn't just the potential cost, it's the loss of control of an important part of our energy
In addition to all this, there are even more conditions which the documents we have seen impose on the UK. The language used is typically dictatorial, as if the UK were in fasct a Member of the EU. One of immediate relevance is that the UK will not be allowed to deviate from EU Net Zero policy. Just as progress is now finally being made with approvals being given for North Sea oil and gas field exploitation, this could all be dis-applied if it contravenes the EU’s policies.
"The envisaged agreement should also ensure the dynamic alignment of the laws of the United Kingdom with the rules of the Union on the promotion of renewable energy and provide for their simultaneous application in the United Kingdom. It should set an indicative global target for the share of renewable energy in the gross final consumption of energy in the United Kingdom. To ensure a level playing field, the global target should be comparable to that of the Union and based on the definitions, requirements and methodologies set by the Union acquis."
In other words, the UK can kiss goodbye to any idea of an independent energy policy.
We rely wholly on patriotic members of the public to survive. Please become a member now if you would like to continue reading us tomorrow, next week, and for all of this pivotal year.
Don't leave this to someone else. You are that 'someone else'.
Finally, who will control our grid?
Then there's the question of who actually controls the UK's own electricity grid. As an independent country it might be thought this question has an obvious answer. In fact, the EU has other ideas. Here is what they have to say about this.
"Finally, the agreement should provide for the participation of the relevant UK regulatory authority, in respect of Great Britain, in the Union agency ACER, without a right to vote, in line with the requirements of the Union acquis. It should also extend to the United Kingdom, in respect of Great Britain, the competences of ACER in terms of regulatory oversight over the functioning of the internal electricity markets."
This puts the EU's agency in effective charge of our grid. 'ACER' will be in charge and we will be doing what is in the interests of the EU, not the UK. This is all incredibly dangerous for our energy security. We sincerely hope that no responsible Government should ever sign up to anything like this.
The above are just two examples. The EU wrote 20 pages including a great number of conditions which the UK must abide by - too many to detail here but which are onerous to say the least. Conversely, the UK Government wrote just five paragraphs and did not mention the extra costs once and nor did it list the onerous conditions. In its latest document on 25 March 2026, it published a lot of technical detail about interconnectivity, but again did not mention the extra costs of the EU Re-Set proposals, nor the conditions attached.
As Lord Redwood concludes:
“Starmer wants to please the EU whilst damaging the UK. The EU, despising his weakness, intend to truss him up over controlling our energy market. They still feel able to demand a huge free gift of cash to help out their slow growth and no-growth failing policies as well.
“The problem is Starmer will fall for this and send another whopping tax bill to the better off and businesses who have stayed in the UK.”
- Lord Redwood, 08 Apr 2026
Observations
Latest EU agreement feels just like being back in the dictatorial, dysfunctional bloc
Reading through the EU's documents made it feel exactly like being back in the EU again. All orders, rules, and regulations, only this time with absolutely no say over any of them. If anything remotely like this is approved by the Government it tells us all we need to know about their desire to give up all sovereignty and any ideas of the United Kingdom as a powerful, independent country on which the EU relies to sell its products.
One of the most worrying things is that we have not been able to find any Government statements rejecting all the EU's outrageous demands out of hand, which of course should be the case.
Please, please help us to carry on our vital work in defence of independence, sovereignty, democracy and freedom by donating today. Thank you.
[ Sources: EU Commission | No.10 | Dept for Net Zero | Facts4EU archives ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.
Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Thurs 09 Apr 2026
Click here to go to our news headlines
Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don't forget actually to post your message after you have previewed it!
Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.
Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.
We think facts matter. Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.
Paypal Users Only - Choose amount first
Quick One-off
Monthly







Something to say about this? Scroll down for reader comments