“Why are we disinterring Brexit?” GB News presenter Martin Daubney was asked yesterday
Our answer: Because Rejoiners won’t let the dead body of Remainerism stay buried
Example: “Brits are pining for the pre-Brexit migration system” runs misleading headline
Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2025
For those who missed it, you can watch our report which inspired the original question
Yesterday Facts4EU.Org was hot news on Britain’s favourite news channel: GB News. This came about as a result of our highly popular and talked-about report using the EU’s own auditors’ figures to show how much bigger Rachel Reeves’ budget ‘black hole’ would have been, if the UK had not left the EU.
At one point the question was asked: “Why are you disinterring Brexit?” The implied sub-text was that somehow we still wanted to glory in having won the EU Referendum, nine years ago. The question came about because Martin Daubney, the presenter, asked GBN's Political Editor to ask about our report and this segment of the show on Lobby terms in Downing Street - inspired. Needless to say the spokesperson was unable to offer a response to our report, given that it was all based on the EU auditors' official figures.
Well, we have some additional news for Rejoiners today.
If the democratic result of the Referendum had been immediately honoured by all concerned, we would all have gone back to our day jobs long ago. And – in the case of the entire Brexit Facts4EU.Org team – we would all have been a great deal better off by now.
The simple fact is that unreconstructed Rejoiners won’t let sleeping dogma lie
With perfect timing, yesterday a major political daily magazine published the results of a survey of the British public it had commissioned, asking people to choose whether they preferred “Britain’s immigration policy prior to leaving the European Union” or “Britain’s current immigration policy, implemented since leaving the European Union.”
Now Brexit is to blame for uncontrolled immigration
The predictable opening read:
“Brits voted for Brexit because of immigration. Now they want to turn back the clock.
“By a whopping two-to-one margin, voters now favor [sic] the pre-2021 immigration system to the one that has taken shape since leaving the EU, according to striking new polling…”
The article ran on in this vein for many paragraphs, before eventually starting to admit that its headline may not be truly representative of what the polling was saying. A research manager at the polling company was quoted as saying that the results are unlikely to be a reflection of people “wistfully looking back at a time of free movement.”
A spokesman for a green think-tank was interviewed, commenting “The overall preference for the pre-Brexit system is most likely the combined result of, on the one hand, the long-standing cohort of Remain supporters continuing to back a pro-EU position, alongside a wider frustration with recent immigration policy, including among those who voted leave.”
So, very few like the current level of immigration, but it has nothing to do with Brexit
People know from their own experience that they often only have time to scan headlines, and to read some of an article. A typical reader of the article we refer to would have to be very interested to read down to the point where the entire premise of the polling is questioned. The majority of readers would have gone away with the impression that Brexit is once again at fault – this time for allowing immigration to rise to such unacceptable levels.
It is this kind of relentless Rejoinerism which is the reason the Brexit Facts4EU.Org team is – just about – still fighting. And in answer to the question in our own headline – “Why are we disinterring Brexit?” - it is precisely because Rachel Reeves has intimated that Brexit is to blame for her need to break her promises and raise taxes in the budget next month that we researched and published the article which was so popular yesterday.
If we had any other option we wouldn't ask, but...
We rely wholly on patriotic members of the public to survive. Please donate today if you would like to continue reading us tomorrow, next week, and the weeks after.
Don't leave this to someone else. You are that 'someone else'.
Finally, in case you missed it…
Here is the Deputy Chairman and Comms Director of CIBUK, and Vice-Chairman of Stand for Our Sovereignty, Ben Philips, being interviewed by Martin Daubney and Christopher Hope on GB News yesterday.
In addition, our report was covered in an article on the online version of GB News here.
© GB News 2025
Observations
Thank you to all those who made kind comments on social media about our report yesterday.
To those Rejoiners who made vile, obscene, and/or illiterate posts, we suggest you go and take a long, hard look at yourselves in the mirror. Quite how you think you win the argument by doing this is beyond us.
To everyone else, please, please help us to carry on our vital work in defence of independence, sovereignty, democracy and freedom by donating today. Thank you.
[ Sources: GB News | A major political daily (Unnamed as they are not atypical) ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.
Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Fri 17 Oct 2025
Click here to go to our news headlines
Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don't forget actually to post your message after you have previewed it!
Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.
Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.
We think facts matter. Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.
Paypal Users Only - Choose amount first
Quick One-off
Monthly
Something to say about this? Scroll down for reader comments