“They just don’t get it” – The rot won't stop with only two gone at the BBC
Licence payer numbers dropping, prosecutions in freefall - Here is how we have a national broadcaster to be proud of
Montage © Facts4EU.Org 2025
A personal view from the Chairman of Facts4EU and CIBUK, on how to transform the BBC beyond recognition
Firstly, a mea culpa. I only ever watch, listen to, or read our national broadcaster’s output when I have to, in a professional capacity. So how am I qualified to condemn it as I do today?
I grew up in a household where it was the source of news and current affairs. The BBC started losing me softly years ago; a process that accelerated in recent years to the point where I now find its journalism to have fallen so far as to be a dark shadow of its former self. It is because of my professional responsibilities that I still have to experience in a limited way what it produces. That is enough to qualify me to write its obituary as an organisation in its current form.
At this point two shout-outs are called for. Firstly to Michael Prescott, the former BBC adviser and ‘whistleblower’, and secondly to Gordon Rayner at the Telegraph for exposing the latest scandals. Today the latter can be rightly proud during their morning news conference for having toppled the DG. That will take a few minutes before they move on, as I am doing, to the all-important question. What now?
Two resignations are meaningless
The resignations of the Director General and the Chief Executive of BBC News are irrelevant on their own. For the BBC to return to its former glory nothing less than a complete change of senior management is required. The letters which have been published last night beam a glow of ghastly magnificence over just how deep-rooted the problems are.
Below are some extracts. The emboldening is mine.
“In these increasingly polarised times, the BBC is of unique value and speaks to the very best of us. It helps make the UK a special place; overwhelmingly kind, tolerant and curious.”
“We should champion it [the BBC], not weaponise it.”
“Despite the inevitable issues and challenges, our journalism and quality content continues to be admired as a gold standard.”
“Also, our work together on ensuring that we have the right culture has been important and motivating.”
“It is a precious UK institution and you are a world-class team.”
“I will always be a passionate cheerleader for civilised society, a strong BBC and a thriving UK.”
- Tim Davie, Director-General, BBC, 09 Nov 2025
“I have never been more proud of the work that you do every day. You really are the best of the best.”
“While mistakes have been made, I want to be absolutely clear recent allegations that BBC News is institutionally biased are wrong.”
“In a polarised world, BBC News journalism is more vital than ever, and I could not be prouder of the work that you do.”
“My plea to you: please keep the courage to continue our mission.”
- Deborah Turness, Chief Executive, BBC News, 09 Nov 2025
I would like to quote from the resignation letters of the likes of Jonathan Munro, the BBC’s global head of news content, but he and others have yet to do the decent thing.
‘Us versus them’ in a “polarised” world
Some more detailed suggestions for how these statements might be decoded appear further down, but the overriding message to BBC management and staff is apparently: “Nothing to see here”. The BBC is doing a wonderful job, is admired the world over, and it’s “us versus them” in this “increasingly polarised” world.
When you work in an enormous organisation like the BBC for 20 years, as the outgoing DG has done, it must be possible to believe that its belief system is normal. When managers employ Human Resources managers in their own image, who in turn recruit staff in their own image, within the space of 20 years you can feel content that everyone thinks as you do.
Well I have news for you, Mr Davis. They don’t. The majority of the people of the country whose culture and beliefs you are supposed to reflect have increasingly been thinking very differently to you - and to the thousands of fellow travellers you’ve signed up. In fact, I would argue that they have never believed in the things you believe in so passionately.
A wake-up call – the number of households without a licence is soaring
This chart, taken from the BBC’s own figures, should be a salutary warning to Mr Davie and his colleagues.
Households without a licence - proportion has more than doubled
© Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2025 - click to enlarge
I believe in traditional British values but I’m not sure the BBC shares my beliefs
Both resignation messages to staff used the word ‘polarised’. I’m almost surprised Mr Davie wasn’t able to fit in the word ‘populist’.
It could not be clearer that senior management at the BBC see themselves as the bulwark standing against a tide of distasteful opinions expressed by the likes of Nigel Farage and his colleagues, and now increasingly used by some Conservatives. Indeed we are now even seeing some Labour MPs and ministers starting to employ terms that would have had them crying ‘wacist’ some years ago and running for the nearest safe space.
What now for the BBC?
As so often these days, Mr Farage said it most clearly. And this is a non-partisan observation.
“The Government needs to appoint somebody with a record of coming in and turning companies and their cultures around. Preferably it would be someone coming in from the private sector who has run a forward-facing business and understands PR.
“This is the BBC’s last chance. If they don’t get this right, there will be vast numbers of people refusing to pay the licence fee.”
- Nigel Farage MP, Leader, Reform UK, 09 Nov 2025

Let’s take that further. A strong individual from the private sector, yes. This need not necessarily be someone with journalism experience. It could be someone with experience of running a commercial organisation, where its public face is vital to its success.
In an organisation the size of the BBC, one individual at the top will not be enough. He or she will need to appoint a team of 4-5 direct reports – senior managers of the same ilk. As directives start to be delivered down the food chain, some senior managers will resign in protest. This will save on the cost of firings, which will also be necessary.
Will there be strikes? Undoubtedly. The BBC now has around one-third (34%) of the audience share, according to the BARB figures for 2024. This means two-thirds watch other channels. If there are strikes, more people will watch the other channels available, and when the strikes are over the BBC may find it does not recover all those viewers and listeners. For the worldwide audience strikes would be regrettable, but at the end of it they will once again find themselves watching unbiased reporting on world events.
Would you work through the night for £1.27 per hour?
We're sure no-one at the BBC would...
If more patriotic members of the public don't donate, we will not survive into our 11th year.
Please donate today if you would like to continue reading us tomorrow, next week, and the weeks after.
Don't leave this to someone else. You are that 'someone else'.
Let’s not forget that compulsory licence fee - BBC took nearly £4bn from us in 12 months to Sept
In the 12 months to September of this year, the BBC took an astonishing £3.867 billion pounds off the public. (Source: Office for National Statistics.) That’s getting on for £4 billion, as a direct, compulsory tax. It’s one of the few taxes which people evade where they live in constant fear of a knock on the door.
The licence fee is controlled via the Communications (Television Licencing) Regulations 2004. As stated by TV Licencing:
“It is an offence to watch or record television programmes as they are being shown on any channel and on any broadcast platform (terrestrial, satellite, cable and the internet) or download or watch BBC programmes on demand, including catch up TV, on BBC iPlayer without a valid TV Licence”
- TV Licensing
Let’s take a look at what has happened to convictions for evading this tax
The dramatic fall in BBC licence fee tax evasion convictions
© Brexit Facts4EU.Org 2025 - click to enlarge
Observations
All we want is impartial journalism and entertainment that isn’t infested with wokery
Am I ultimately responsible for impartial journalism? No of course not. The organisations I have the honour to chair are partial. They present facts exclusively from official sources, but the teams and I all believe in restoring the United Kingdom as a fully independent country. The ‘Observations’ which appear at the end of our reports make this clear.
Are we all capable of impartial journalism? Yes. We could all do that job but we choose instead to redress the balance of organisations like the BBC which pump out very partial and – as we have recently learned once again – manufactured ‘news’. It makes a mockery of their ‘Fact Check’ department.
While organisations like the BBC exist, there is a desperate need for organisations like Brexit Facts4EU and The Campaign for an Independent Britain (CIBUK). Please do whatever you can to support us and keep us going. We are on our last legs financially, unlike the BBC with its £3.9 billion.
Please, please help us to carry on our vital work in defence of independence, sovereignty, democracy and freedom by donating today. Thank you.
[ Sources: The BBC | BARB | X.Com ] Politicians and journalists can contact us for details, as ever.
Brexit Facts4EU.Org, Mon 10 Nov 2025
Click here to go to our news headlines
Please scroll down to COMMENT on the above article.
And don't forget actually to post your message after you have previewed it!
Since before the EU Referendum, Brexit Facts4EU.Org
has been the most prolific researcher and publisher of Brexit facts in the world.
Supported by MPs, MEPs, & other groups, our work has impact.
We think facts matter. Please donate today, so that we can continue to ensure a clean Brexit is finally delivered.
Paypal Users Only - Choose amount first
Quick One-off
Monthly






Something to say about this? Scroll down for reader comments