Observations

Double standards and EU hypocrisy

There are of course differences between the UK Government's plans and the scheme in operation by the UN, funded by the EU. The Rwanda and Niger flights are from Libya, not an EU country. Nevertheless, they are in response to the large numbers of illegal boat migrants crossing from North Africa to the EU. And these flights prove beyond any doubt that both the UN and the EU consider Rwanda to be a safe country in which to house and process asylum seekers.

It must be remembered that Italy - an EU member country - is continuing to experience a vast number of illegal boat migrants crossing from Libya. The EU's funding of flights of the migrants in Libya to Rwanda and Niger is part of its response.

Four years ago there were fewer than 300 illegal migrants arriving in Britain by boat. This year so far 45,000 have arrived. Something has to be done, as the UK Government payments to France to stop them setting off from their shores and apprehending the human traffickers has not prevented the migrant numbers increasing. Nor has it prevented the appalling deaths at sea.

This is a French and EU problem - and in the UK this is not about race

In all the outrage expressed by people such as the Archbishop of Canterbury, one essential fact is missing. The tens of thousands of illegal migrants are coming from France – a safe country. In order to reach France, illegal migrants have to enter the EU and then cross internal borders. Some travel through Spain, many come up through Greece and Italy. All of these countries are safe havens for genuine refugees.

The British Prime Minister is a person of colour, as is the Home Secretary, the Foreign Secretary, the previous Home Secretary, the previous Chancellor of the Exchequer, and many Ministers. The Danish Immigration Minister we quoted is a man of colour. There is nothing racist about the debate on the illegal migrant crisis, no matter how much Rejoiners like to pretend it is.

The Rwanda deterrent

The concept of moving the predominantly young, single, male ‘boat people’ to Rwanda is a technical solution that might offer some success at stopping the traffickers. It means the illegal immigrants can at last be deported even if they have destroyed their identity documents. Without identity documents it is practically impossible to get the countries of origin to accept the illegal immigrants are theirs.

It worked for Australia, why not for the UK?

Typically the scheme has come in for a great deal of criticism and yet it enjoys popular support from the public - 47% for versus 26% against, according to a Savanta Com Res poll.

It remains to be seen whether it will work but no-one else seems to have any workable and legal ideas. Simply turning inflatable craft around risks more fatalities as well as an international incident and possible national humiliation.

In the main, the most vociferous critics are believers of completely open borders and should be disregarded as an extreme minority. Then we have the lawyers who have benefited hugely from the public purse. Once the “refugees” see they are spending money on a one-way ticket to Rwanda, the traffickers may have a problem selling seats on their boats.

Only time will tell – if the whole enterprise isn’t scuppered by our courts and the EU’s Convention on Human Rights, of course…

Facts4EU.Org needs your financial support today

We are a 'not for profit' team (we make a loss) and any donation goes towards the actual work, not plush London offices, lunch or taxi expenses, or other luxuries of some organisations.

We badly need more of our thousands of readers to donate – no matter how small an amount it all helps. Could this be you, today? Maybe you've been thinking about it, but just haven't got around to doing it? If so, let us reassure you. It's quick and easy and we use two highly secure payment providers. And we do NOT ask you for further donations if you donate once - we just hope that you keep supporting us. Your donation stays anonymous unless you tell us otherwise.

Please don't assume that other people will keep us going - we don't receive enough to survive and we need your help today. Could you help us?

Most of our readers are well-informed and appreciate our fact-based articles, presented in a way you won't see anywhere else. If you value reports like the one above, please help our work with a donation. We have far more to do in researching, publishing, campaigning and lobbying Parliament than we have in terms of the financial resources to fulfil these tasks. We badly need funding to continue - we rely 100% on public donations from readers like you.

If you believe in a fully-free, independent, and sovereign United Kingdom, please make a donation now. It’s quick, secure, and confidential, and you can use one of the links below or you can use our Donations page here. You will receive a personal, friendly ‘thank you’ from a member of our team within 24 hours. Thank you for reading this.